Is it a horrendous idea? No. I do realize people daily it. It is just not designed for it. If something breaks on Arch, you can just check social media for an update and know it’ll be fixed shortly or what the fix is on your end. And the Arch community will probably loudly complain about it until it is back to normal, because people daily Arch. For Debian Testing/Unstable it’s more like you report an issue and they go “noted!” and if you complain they’ll go “use stable then”. A bit of an exaggeration but there are no patch notes and no dedicated security team. Security patches will get to you maybe at some point. This isn’t to trash Debian in any way, but it is what it says on the tin: the testing/unstable variant, not a rolling release.
idk, is it really that bad? I’ve heard of many people using debian sid for daily
Is it a horrendous idea? No. I do realize people daily it. It is just not designed for it. If something breaks on Arch, you can just check social media for an update and know it’ll be fixed shortly or what the fix is on your end. And the Arch community will probably loudly complain about it until it is back to normal, because people daily Arch. For Debian Testing/Unstable it’s more like you report an issue and they go “noted!” and if you complain they’ll go “use stable then”. A bit of an exaggeration but there are no patch notes and no dedicated security team. Security patches will get to you maybe at some point. This isn’t to trash Debian in any way, but it is what it says on the tin: the testing/unstable variant, not a rolling release.