sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoCleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Themwww.gadgetreview.comexternal-linkmessage-square204linkfedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkCleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Themwww.gadgetreview.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square204linkfedilink
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·8 days agoSo there is a country with more guns than inhabitants, and they are afraid of a f-ing laser?
minus-squareiLStrix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoI would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoDepends on the definition of “strong”. If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.
So there is a country with more guns than inhabitants, and they are afraid of a f-ing laser?
I would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.
Depends on the definition of “strong”.
If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.