In the latest episode of “they will always sell you out” - they sold you out! Who would’ve thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can’t exist without “leeching” off of Bitwarden.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Two articles behind a paywall, one that won’t load, and another article that says the big problem with passkeys is…people are unfamiliar with them.

      If anyone tells you that Passkeys are bad, they’re a liar. Way more safe than passwords, full stop.

      Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is no full stop there… A password that is sufficiently long will never be cracked no matter the hashing algorithm in use. Passwords are easily transferrable and can be communicated to a third party in the event of an emergency. They also provide tunable security, where you can trade off security for convenience if you want.

        Some (not all, I know) passkeys are tied to a device. Stolen device means stolen passkey, and it’s potentially very difficult to recover from that. Passkeys are also locked to a certain standard, passwords have no such restrictions.

        Tbh I don’t understand the move for passkeys replacing passwords. They should become the second factor when a user wants additional security. They’re perfect for that niche.

        • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Passkeys provide a secure way to authenticate while also being convenient. With the tradeoffs you mentioned.

          I don’t like the push for only allowing some vendors to issue keys and to not allowing exporting and backups. And password should still be an option.

        • fatalicus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Password can also very easily be stolen during phishing, while passkeys are phishing resistant.

          And while a hardware passkeys can be stole and used, those who steal them will still need the pin to use them, and the two major hardware passkeys options now (Yubico and Token2) both have some pin brute force protection in their firmware to slow someone down long enough for an account to be secured another way.

          As for passkeys on phones, they require the pin or biometric used to unlock the phones to be used.

          • qqq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “Difficult to recover from” was referencing setting all of your accounts back up. I should have also included “lost” and “broken” to make that more obvious. Many hardware (most? all?) passkeys do not allow for backup and restore.

            But I do see an issue with stolen hardware passkeys being used for access too if they’re a primary factor. With the mitigations you mentioned hopefully holding up.

      • Flagstaff@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you calling me a liar? That’s pretty weird; it’s not like I’m telling you to stick to passwords while I move to passkeys. With that said, though, get Bypass Paywalls Clean (Mozilla-only, as far as I know) and you’ll never see another paywall again. I forgot about having that.

        Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

        The problem is that this is where it’s eventually going to lead to.

        • Lemmert@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          At the very least you’re misguided or don’t know what you’re talking about. Passkeys are not vendor locked in and of themselves.

          You can make the same argument against password managers because most iPhone users that use them, use Apple’s one.

          • qqq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            They will almost certainly lead to vendor lock in. Why do you think they won’t? Apple’s password manager is definitely an example of vendor lock in. Many others have a simple to use export feature to CSV or something that others can understand

            Edit: it could be that you don’t know what the WebAuthn/FIDO2 specification says or we understand it differently? Do you know how the attestation mechanism works? That ties the key to a device of software authenticator (the software authenticator is likely going to tie it to the device somehow, possibly even via a TEE).

        • fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not really, Vaultwarden/bitwa4den offer passkey support. When I log into a service a popup shows on my extension, I click it and I’m in. It’s not gonna lead to device locking if you don’t want to…

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            except when the wide populace starts accepting it being device locked, and your opinion does not matter anymore to those making the decisions