sanitation@lemmy.radio to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMost Americans say AI development is moving too fast and twice as many are AI pessimists as AI optimistsyougov.comexternal-linkmessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1426arrow-down15
arrow-up1421arrow-down1external-linkMost Americans say AI development is moving too fast and twice as many are AI pessimists as AI optimistsyougov.comsanitation@lemmy.radio to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareInfinite@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoFeeling it’s too fast and optimist/pessimist aren’t mutually exclusive.
minus-squareSvengarlic @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoWhile not mutually exclusive, you are limited by the total population of respondents. If 60% of people say it’s too fast, then would not it require 120% of that same population to double it?
minus-squareInfinite@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day ago(Most Americans say AI development is moving too fast) and (twice as many are AI pessimists as AI optimists)
minus-squareSvengarlic @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoMy mistake, thank you for the clarification. I initially interpreted it as the same cohort.
minus-squareInfinite@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoIt’s awkwardly structured, for sure. I understand the confusion. 🫡
Feeling it’s too fast and optimist/pessimist aren’t mutually exclusive.
While not mutually exclusive, you are limited by the total population of respondents. If 60% of people say it’s too fast, then would not it require 120% of that same population to double it?
(Most Americans say AI development is moving too fast) and (twice as many are AI pessimists as AI optimists)
My mistake, thank you for the clarification. I initially interpreted it as the same cohort.
It’s awkwardly structured, for sure. I understand the confusion. 🫡