• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    The code is literally right there for the taking. Why would they spend the time rebuilding something when they could just have it for free?

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because then they would have something better and would have improved one of the most popular extensions in their browser?

      • Zangoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They are quite literally taking the “if you don’t like it, fork it yourself” approach. Who said they aren’t going to make changes/improvements on top of it?

        I don’t see anyone else mentioning it but this is also probably because brave browser is published under the MPL license so the licenses are actually compatible between projects. They don’t want to implement completely from scratch because there is a compatible existing implementation that they can build on top of instead of starting from scratch.