• sniggleboots@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I feel like I realized something profound when I was replying to your message initially. I was going to say something that I still find somewhat reasonable: if you create or develop or invent something useful or revolutionary, surely people shouldn’t be allowed to copy it for free? You did all the work

    But then I realized that’s pretty close to poor people voting against taxing m/billionaires more. I’m not a millionaire, and I’m not developing any revolutionary tech either

    • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      One of the greatest tricks Capitalists ever pulled was convincing creative individuals that copyright exists to serve their interests.

      My comments stem from broader work I’ve been ruminating on.

      The current IP regime (copyright, patents, trademark, etc.) incentivise locking ideas up and away as tightly as possible, they aren’t fit for purpose, and should be largely done away with, but the void that would leave needs a replacement that is proven and battle hardened.

      My current proposition is a mechanism that rewards the spread of knowledge, and its comprehension, as broad and deep as practicable.

      Creating, discovering, disseminating, and explaining ideas should be rewarded, but not by housing them in conjured gaol cells.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The problem patents were solving was an inventor creating something and having it completely taken over by a well funded company leaving said inventor penniless. They created a new problem, though, when the well funded companies realized they could just buy all the patents and force everyone else to pay them while holding those ideas hostage.