Paul McCartney’s official Reddit account seems to have been banned. The account, u/paulmccartney, had just dropped a set of photos and videos from the first night of his shows at the Fonda Theatre. It went straight into the r/PaulMcCartney subreddit. Then, not long after, the whole thing disappeared.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s funny how a lot of the complaints I’m reading here are about how Reddit is unfriendly toward left-leaning people but all the right wing people complain about how Reddit is a cesspool of liberal propaganda.

    It just goes to show that the platform plays both sides just to promote hate and anger.

    I visited after I got banned and the default posts that show up without logging in (therefore uncurated) were all so irritating that I had to assume they were all ragebait.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Reddit is hostile towards left-leaning people, and it is also a cesspool of liberal propaganda. Liberals fucking hate leftists, even more than they hate fascists, because liberalism is fundamentally pro-capitalism. That’s why the mainstream media is currently crashing out about people like Hasan Piker, who actually represent a growing base of support for socialism, and they run every possible smear they can.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes they are. Liberal covers a wide range of ideology. The liberal versus leftists debate is a Russian pysop

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The American use of political terms like liberal and socialist are warped from their original meanings.

          Both can mean supporting healthcare for everyone for example. Even though that’s neither a policy following from the theory of liberalism, nor is socialized healthcare dependent on following socialism.

          The same is true for progressivism and leftists. All of these terms are often used interchangeably to the previous two.

          There’s a deep lack of nuance and specificity.

          Actual Marxist leftists and democratic liberals are ideologically opposed to another in many ways. In the US they might agree on better healthcare for everyone and waving rainbow flags. Liberals should be for free markets, (regulated) capitalism, freedoms, etc. A leftist should be opposed to all of these. Freedom to a Marxist means something else than to a liberal.

          Nowadays a lot of political discourse across the spectrum is deeply rooted in identity, creating division, virtue signaling, moralist preaching, etc.

          Discussion on specific politics and details is often cut short by the above campism and clinging to identities.

          This applies to the right and the left equally.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ok, whatever. The point was that they have fun seeing us bicker over shit for their profit.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “Wing” is not the term to use. Liberals sat on the left side of parliament, literally the left wing of a hall, so it’s accurate and quite literal to call them “left wing”. What isn’t accurate is calling them leftist, as in socialist, and I think that’s the term everyone is actually talking about? Everyone is talking past each other here cause of the wing thing.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Well… The “wing” of a parliament very roughly represents a political compass. Liberals aren’t left-wing anymore by virtue of having more politically left parties that occupy those physical seats today.

          It does create a very funny situation like here in Denmark where “Venstre” (literally The Danish word for “Left”) is a right-wing political party. More right-wing than “Liberale Alliance” (Danish Liberal Party).

          But Venstre used to be the left-wing party when it formed. Since then, green parties, socialist parties, communist parties, and various parties adjacent to those ideologies, have formed to occupy the left side of the parliament seats, pushing Venstre’s physical seating position all the way to the right side.

          With liberals and moderates being more politically left than them, Venstre now sits right next to the most conservative parties of Denmark. They’re still keeping the name, though.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          More like the European reality.

          Compared to Europe, America doesn’t have a left wing. Just a right wing and an extreme right wing.

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Liberalism is fundamentally a right wing ideology, it’s primarily concerned about the freedom of markets, rather than the freedoms of people, and when it comes down to choosing between the rights of individuals and the interests of corporations, liberals will side with business interests, nearly every single time. Usually, they’ll always couch it in more progressive terms, like talking about jobs and economic growth. That’s why both mainstream Democrats and mainstream Republicans agree on most issues, because they’re both pro-business, pro-capitalist institutions.

          • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So you can’t be pro human liberty anymore? That’s what being a liberal is to me. Corporations are not our friends and hate them as much as a leftist. In my mind, my and my peoples liberty trumps your idea of a perfect economic system. Whatever happens along the way to socialism or back to capitalism, human rights must come first. I don’t know why that concept is so hard for leftists to grasp. I think leftists are affected by a similar psyop that affects Republicans in this regard

            • Tattorack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. Moreover, you seem to be lumping a bunch of things together.

              Are you American? I could blame that on the lack of a proper representative democracy. Everything gets shovelled together into either one camp or the other, even when they don’t have anything related to each other.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Lmao I feel the same. Literally feels like rage bait. Like these people are so freaking ignorant. It doesn’t help a lot of Reddit posts are just bots recirculating old content.