sorting it out with your lawyer later

Youre assuming these ass bags abide by due process, and youll ever see a lawyer

I would say trying to cook 3x faster isnt a surface temp 3x higher, but the rate of heat transfer is 3x faster. Because then your laat step is backwards.

Q = h a dT

If you just calculated H goes up 1.69x, then dT doesnt need to go up MORE, it needs to go up LESS. A higher HTC increases the rate of heat transfer. Which… now you need to recalc your free conv HTC because temp changed. But if it didnt…

3Q = 1.69h a 1.78DT

Old DT was 260, now its 463, which is an ovev temp of 503F

Edit: this is a transient problem we’re trying to reduce to a steady state calculation with pretty poorly defined requirements. Sounds like a typical day at work for me lol

couldn’t even say anything because he was right.

The next step is admitting that the kid was right. Dont just let him have feelings. Validate those feelings.

Guy I work with, everytime he returned from vacation or holiday, would bulk delete every email he received.

“If its important, they’ll follow-up”

Are we still talking about code?